Justin Sun, once considered a key supporter of WLFI, is now in litigation with the project. The dispute has expanded from a token transfer of approximately $9 million to issues such as contract performance, defamation allegations, and whether DeFi projects can freeze user addresses.

From cooperation to rupture

Justin Sun began investing in WLFI at the end of 2024. According to his lawsuit filed in April 2026, he invested approximately $45 million between November 2024 and January 2025, with subsequent purchases bringing his total investment to approximately $75 million, and received an advisory allocation of 1 billion WLFI tokens.

WLFI publicly acknowledged Justin Sun's support at the time, stating that it helped the project overcome its slow start-up phase. The report mentioned that Sun was not only one of the single largest holders, but the Tron network also became a significant distribution channel for the WLFI stablecoin USD1.

272 wallets were frozen

The deterioration in relations between the two parties began in September 2025. WLFI froze 272 wallets at that time due to a phishing incident, stating it was part of a security measure. Justin Sun's wallet was among them.

WLFI alleges that Justin Sun transferred approximately $9 million worth of WLFI tokens, potentially violating the transfer restrictions stipulated in the investment terms. Sun denies any intention to sell prematurely, claiming the actions were merely routine wallet management and arguing that the freeze measures were excessive.

As the price of WLFI tokens fell, Justin Sun's locked-up holdings were reportedly worth approximately $60 million by December 2025. This shifted the conflict from internal project disputes to legal matters.

Lawsuits in both locations are proceeding simultaneously.

Reports indicate that Justin Sun filed a lawsuit against WLFI in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California on April 21, 2026, accusing the company of breach of contract, fraud, and misappropriation, claiming that his losses have exceeded $320 million.

Subsequently, WLFI filed a countersuit in Florida on May 4, accusing Justin Sun of defamation and claiming that he violated contractual restrictions and had also shorted WLFI tokens. The public statements from both sides have escalated significantly, and the dispute has evolved from a breakdown in cooperation into a full-blown legal conflict.

The controversy points to governance authority

This dispute has attracted attention not only because of the special identities of the two parties, but also because it touches on core issues of DeFi projects: whether governance tokens should have the ability to freeze and blacklist addresses, whether project teams can directly restrict the flow of user assets in the event of a security incident, and how much control so-called decentralized governance actually retains in practice.

If the allegations continue to unfold, the WLFI and Justin Sun case could become an important case study for observing the contractual constraints, governance authority, and blacklisting mechanisms of crypto projects.