Virtuals migrates over $700 million worth of cross-chain infrastructure to Chainlink
AMBCrypto
3h ago
Ai Focus
Virtuals has migrated its $700 million VIRTUAL cross-chain infrastructure from LayerZero to Chainlink CCIP. Several other protocols have made similar adjustments following the KelpDAO incident.
Helpful
No.Help

Virtuals Protocol announced that it will migrate its VIRTUAL token cross-chain infrastructure, worth over $700 million, from LayerZero to Chainlink's CCIP. Following the KelpDAO vulnerability incident, cross-chain security has once again become a focus in the DeFi space, and this adjustment further expands the list of protocols recently migrating from LayerZero to CCIP.

The motivation for migration points to cross-chain security.

Virtuals stated that the team made this decision after evaluating various cross-chain solutions, against the backdrop of security concerns raised by KelpDAO's rsETH bridging configuration issues. The protocol claims that its infrastructure for autonomous AI agents requires a higher level of cross-chain protection, and existing standards are insufficient to support the relevant scenarios.

According to Virtuals, once the migration is complete, VIRTUAL's distribution will be further expanded to more DeFi scenarios, while also strengthening the underlying infrastructure of AI agents in payments, collaboration, and on-chain interactions.

Several protocols have switched to CCIP

Virtuals is not an isolated case. The report mentions that in recent weeks, several projects have migrated or announced plans to move their cross-chain infrastructure to Chainlink CCIP, including:

  • KelpDAO
  • Solv Protocol
  • Lombard

The report also mentioned that the Bitcoin encapsulation infrastructure associated with Kraken is among those being adjusted. These migrations involve tokenized assets and cross-chain liquidity worth billions of dollars. As more protocols adjust their routes, CCIP is gaining greater adoption in projects emphasizing institutional-grade security architectures.

Cross-chain competition shifts to security capabilities

In the past few years, competition in the cross-chain sector has focused on speed, composability, and multi-chain scalability. However, after the KelpDAO incident, market discussions have clearly shifted to risk isolation, governance structure, operational resilience, and security capabilities.

For protocols managing large-scale tokenized assets, the ability of cross-chain systems to withstand more sophisticated attack scenarios is becoming increasingly important. This demand is further heightened as stablecoins, tokenized assets, and AI-driven applications begin to transfer larger-scale value across chains.

AI agents increase system requirements

Virtuals' adjustments are also influenced by its business model. The protocol is not a traditional DeFi application, but rather a project building autonomous AI agent infrastructure. Such systems need to support agents in initiating transactions, coordinating tasks, and distributing revenue across different blockchains; therefore, payment channels, messaging, and transaction coordination are no longer secondary tools, but core capabilities.

However, the report also mentioned that some analysts believe that no interoperability system can completely eliminate the structural risks of cross-chain systems. On-chain analytics platform L2Beat previously pointed out that even with CCIP, this type of architecture still relies on governance arrangements, multi-signature, and continuous operational monitoring, so the risks will not completely disappear.

Tip
$0
Like
0
Save
0
Views 502
CoinMeta reminds readers to view blockchain rationally, stay aware of risks, and beware of virtual token issuance and speculation. All content on this site represents market information or related viewpoints only and does not constitute any form of investment advice. If you find sensitive content, please click“Report”,and we will handle it promptly。
Submit
Comment 0
Hot
Latest
No comments yet. Be the first!
Related
LayerZero advances its institutional financial footprint, reigniting controversy over cross-chain security.
LayerZero announced its institutional financial expansion plan and launched a new chain, "Zero"; L2BEAT, on the other hand, questioned whether the migration of cross-chain infrastructure would necessarily bring significant security improvements.
AMBCrypto
·2026-06-04 01:27:40
674
RLUSD integrates with Wormhole's native cross-chain transfer functionality.
RLUSD achieves native multi-chain transfers through Wormhole NTT, and the market is paying attention to its impact on the circulation of cross-chain stablecoins and the activity of the Wormhole ecosystem.
CoinPedia
·2026-06-04 23:58:00
116
Alephium cross-chain bridge attacked, losing $815,000 in 7 minutes.
The TokenBridge between Alephium and Ethereum was attacked, and approximately $815,000 worth of assets were transferred out within 7 minutes.
AMBCrypto
·2026-06-01 09:23:05
436
Aave adjusts listing standards and tightens cross-chain risk review following the rsETH incident.
Aave stated that the rsETH attack stemmed from a failure in the LayerZero cross-chain bridge verification used by KelpDAO, rather than a vulnerability in the protocol's own contract. Aave will review all V3 assets and incorporate cross-chain bridge, oracle, and custody risks into its listing review process.
CoinDesk
·2026-06-01 13:13:28
567
Crypto attack losses decreased significantly in May compared to the previous month, but cross-chain bridges remained the hardest hit area.
Losses from crypto attacks declined significantly in May, but cross-chain bridges and code vulnerabilities remain the main sources of risk.
Coinpaper
·2026-06-01 18:33:53
666